editor decision started nature rejection

Stage 2: Editor assigned. Authors should note that as Nature is an interdisciplinary journal, referees for a paper are chosen for different reasons, for example a technical expert and a person who has a general overview of a field might both referee the same paper. Could you please shed some light on the outcome of your situation? Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Follow. The SEC pay-to-play rule for investment advisers as it turns 12 Before publication, the Journals and Editorial press office also informs the press / public information officers of authors' institutions to allow them to prepare their own publicity. on 05 Apr, 2021. the editor usually submits a brief comment on the article to the editor in chief who then has the final say and will make the decision available to you. 'We regret to inform you'that your scientific manuscripts will be This structured form allows us to evaluate the issues more efficiently, and we hope it will also help authors focus their arguments, and perhaps even recognize when they are wasting their time. However, if it has not gone through peer review, but is directly showing the status awaiting final decision, then there is a possibility that your paper might be rejected after initial screening by the editor. Editorial criteria and processes | Nature I was shocked and disappointed by your rejection letter, authors write, hundreds of times each year, I must ask that you reconsider your decision. Rejection is of course a fact of life for all scientists, particularly when they submit their work to highly selective journals; in less than five years since its inception, Nature Neuroscience, for example, has turned away over 6000 manuscripts, roughly 90% of all submissions. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? Finally, despite persistent beliefs to the contrary, we do not base our decisions on the reputations of the authors or their friends, and so we do not respond favorably to 'celebrity endorsements' or statements about authors' previous track records. When facing rejection, many of us don't even know that there is a formal process of appealing the decision. In practice, of course, this is impossible, and editors must instead rely on a few referees representing a cross-section of informed opinion in the field. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? General Average and Risk Management in Medieval and Early Modern The reviewers only make recommendations. You could ask how soon they think they will answer, or give a deadline yourself, warning them that, after that deadline without having heard, you will submit the text to another publisher. ensure that the figures and tables are clear and will fit in the space available. It doesnt mean anything other than the editor has started to look at your paper. How long does an editor decision take? - Studybuff However, because the number of appeals has been growing to the point that it threatens to overwhelm our editorial resources, we have recently implemented a new system for considering them. Most referees honour their prior agreement with Nature to deliver a report within seven days or other agreed time limit, and send their reports online. In all these cases, it is likely that some time will elapse before Nature can respond, and the paper must not be submitted for publication elsewhere during this time. . [CDATA[> round 1""nature nature metabolism. Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Decision pending means that the decision is pending.They havent decided yet. Most professional editors have eyes on the page from four to six hours a day; any more tends to dull the focus needed to spot issues. Is it possible to create a concave light? If an author wishes to appeal against Nature's decision, the appeal must be made in writing, not by telephone, and should be confined to the scientific case for publication. :-) So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. edit: so no. This, in turn, means that the status Awaiting decision refers to the decision that the editor will take about whether your paper will be sent for peer review or desk rejected. 9.3 weeks. Until then, you may find it worthwhile to go through the following resources about journal statuses: Answered by Irfan Syed Under these circumstances, the editors letter will state explicitly whether or not a resubmitted version would be considered. What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made' back to 'Under consideration' mean for Nature? My paper was published in a journal in 2021 october. Special attention is paid by the editors to the readability of submitted material. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. We understand your anxiety :-) However, the decision on manuscript acceptance depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of peer reviewers and the extent of revisions recommended. If you receive a revise and resubmit it may take another 24 months to hear back on the revised article. This will reduce delays. A reject decision at this stage is final and cannot be reversed. It is difficult to predict the outcome of the manuscript at this stage, but you can be hopeful. Scott, Michael - Ancient Worlds_ A Global History of Antiquity | PDF At each stage, the editor will discuss the manuscript with editorial colleagues in the light of referees reports, and send a letter to the author offering one of the following options: Editors letters also contain detailed guidance about the papers format and style where appropriate (see below), which should be read in conjunction with the manuscript formatting guide when revising and resubmitting. Although Nature editors go to every effort to ensure manuscripts are assessed fairly, Nature is not responsible for the conduct of its referees.Nature welcomes authors' suggestions for suitable independent referees (with their contact details), but editors are free to decide themselves who to use as referees. Cactus Communications. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. Short answer: the editor will continue to try and find other suitable reviewers, sending them invitations and waiting for replies. Directly from with editor, to decision under process. Motivation: The total time it took for the manuscript to be rejected without being sent for review was too long, in our opinion (1 month). Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Proofs are cycled between Natures production staff, our typesetter and the author by means of an online production-tracking system. Nature is reluctant to consult new referees unless there is a particular, relevant area of scientific expertise that was lacking in the referees already used. One's knowledge, images, and emotions regarding the past have an impact on future actions. Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. To complicate matters further, editors must base their decisions on evidence that is never completely reliable. The paper is accepted for publication without any further changes required from the authors. After a paper is accepted, it is subedited (copyedited) to ensure maximum clarity and reach, a process that enhances the value of papers in various ways. Most journals typically take around 4-12 weeks to share their final decision. Additionally, for help with writing to the journal, you may find this handbook useful: How to communicate with the journal? Sometimes they are more busy. Editor rejected manuscript claiming it is similar to a not-yet-published manuscript (that I haven't seen). - ii a. I gave them his address. Journalists have embargoedaccess to papers via the Nature Research press site, and are permitted to show papers to independent specialists a few days in advance of publication, under embargo conditions, solely for the purpose of eliciting comment on the work described. //-->Punnag Ghaisas - Assistant Editor for Discover Journals - LinkedIn For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. Your IP: #AcademicChatter" Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? The Academic Editor being consulted will be asked to provide an advisory recommendation on the manuscript and may recommend acceptance, further peer-review, or uphold the original rejection decision. Please avoid repeating information that is already present in the abstract and introduction. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative, Nature Neuroscience (Nat Neurosci) Locate submission instructions for a Springer journal, Submit a manuscript with your ORCID number, Submit a Nature Portfolio manuscript for Open Access publishing, Submit multimedia files to be published online with your article. [CDATA[// >editor decision started nature rejection - playtcubed.com But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. "Advice please! In recognition of the time and expertise our reviewers provide toNatures editorial process, we formally acknowledge their contribution to the external peer review of articles published in the journal. What does it mean if the status is 'under consideration' for two weeks? Internet Explorer). However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. Elsevier is currently publishing not only the time to 1st decision and publication but also the CiteScore, Impact Factor, and Acceptance rate of their journals. //-->Manuscript Status Tables Part 2 - Notes from the JGR-Space Physics We've added a "Necessary cookies only" option to the cookie consent popup. . Editors also strongly encourage authors in appropriate disciplines to include a simple schematic summarizing the main conclusion of the paper, which can be published with the paper as Supplementary Information. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. good luck!! As opposed to an editor, a peer reviewer advises the researcher of how he would have conducted his research, and what research methods would have made a difference. Authors are provided the opportunity to opt out of this scheme at the completion of the peer review process, before the paper is accepted. section 8 houses for rent in stockbridge, ga editor decision started nature rejection Sometimes they are more busy. No news is good news? This scheme only applies to original research Articles, and not to Review articles or to other published content. The paper is accepted for publication in principle once the authors have made some revisions in response to the referees comments. There isnt any secret code to deciphering the submission tracker. Is there a single-word adjective for "having exceptionally strong moral principles"? the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Is there a proper earth ground point in this switch box? We do our best to insure a fair and consistent process for all authors, but procedural concerns must be balanced against our obligation to maintain, and if possible raise, the journal's overall standards. Physical Review X - Editorial Policies and Practices Answered by Editage Insights b. I regret giving them his address. [CDATA[// >

Wivb Sports Reporters, Articles E